Today, the weather seemed pretty good for photos, sunny but somewhat overcast to soften the shadows. It has been a while since we had visited Kline Creek Farm, in fact I hadn’t been there since a family portrait session last November!

This coupled with the fact that I had a new compact camera to try out was all the excuse the boys and I needed to visit the farm. Seeing the farm cat was at the forefront of the boys agenda, first breakfast at Egg Harbor then off we went!

All photos taken with Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Panasonic 20mm f1.7 lens, enjoy, we did!

O and don’t forget your family photo album, the weather right now is perfect for a family photo shoot, don’t wait to book until it is too hot and sticky!

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

Kline Creek Farm

 

Up to now all printing for my newborn, children, senior, engagement and family photos has been outsourced to a professional print lab. But in the name of retaining and ensuring quality control from the press of the shutter button to delivery of prints to clients I will now be offering in house printed archival quality fine art Giclée prints.

Epson 4900

Print sizes from 8×10 up to 16×32 are offered.

These prints can be printed on a choice of papers from gloss to luster to matte. The photo seen above is printed on cotton. Inks and papers have an expected lifespan of 100-300 years.

The advantage of printing in house is that the camera can be calibrated to my post processing monitor which in turn can be calibrated to the printer and the photos adjusted exactly for the paper it is being printed on, custom sizing is also now possible.

For more information click here, and to book a photo session, click here.

 

 

Had some fun with the lights today. It isn’t very often that I set up the lights indoors these days as so much space is needed, I generally prefer to shoot outside with the lights, but when I freind asked if I would be able to take a headshot for her business card, that seemed like a good excuse to get the lights setup. We were done inside 45minutes from shot to processing to print.

Portrait

 

Setup was a breeze too, thanks to my able assistant…

 

 

 

Olympus OM-M E-M5

This is a question I get asked alot, and its one that I cannot really answer as it is dependant on so many variables and what is important to the person asking the question – do you value image quality, size, autofocus speed, frames per second… the list is almost endless, the question is somewhat similar to someone asking “What car should I buy?”.

But a question I can answer is what camera would ‘I’ buy. Recently there has been rash of new cameras being released. Nothing new there, there are new cameras being released all the time, however recently there have been four notable camera releases, camera releases that people; photographers in particular, have been waiting for. The notable cameras I am talking about are:

  • Fuji X-Pro1 (16mp) ($1700)
  • Olympus OM-D E-5M (16mp) ($999)
  • Canon 5D mark III (22mp) ($3500)
  • Nikon D800 (36mp) ($2999)

The Nikon is not that interesting to me. It is a great camera, but I have a large investment in Canon lenses, so shifting to a Nikon system would be a huge undertaking for me, as a result I wont focus on that camera in this post. The other 3 are of interest to me though for a couple of reasons.

My current camera lineup includes three cameras, a small one, a large one and a fast one, as follows -

Panasonic GF1

This is my small camera. It has pretty good quality in good light conditions, takes interchangable micro fourthirds lenses, is relatively fast for a small camera, the sensor is quite large for such a small camera, much larger than your average pocket size point and shoot.

Canon 50D

This is my fast camera, it will shoot at six frames per second which is more than enough for my needs, it takes all of my Canon lenses, it has an identical user interface to my Canon 5D mark II; so I can setup both cameras to work identically, its image quality is excellent in good to average light conditions. It also has a crop sensor which means I get a bit more reach out of my lenses (see previous post on crop sensors).

Canon 5D markII

This is my high quality camera. The image quality it delivers is among the best in the 35mm sized camera category. It delivers large 21megapixel images, fantastic colors and is excellent in all light conditions (at least that I shoot in). But it is slow as compared to the 50D at three frames per second, has an archaic autofocus system and can only shoot exposure brackets of three shots, but this camera is all about image quality and it is my goto camera for portrait shoots and landscape shoots and even candid shooting, because I like good image quality. It spends a good majority of its time attached to a tripod.

New Crop of Cameras

So am I buying a new camera, the short answer is, yes! I preordered the Olympus OM-D E-M5 the day it was announced as a replacement for my Panasonic GF1, it should be here in about a month from now. I wont however be upgrading my Canon 5D mark II to the just announced Canon 5D mark III, here is why…

When I want high quality photos of anything, I always use my Canon 5D mark II, it is my goto camera most of the time, however it has a couple of drawbacks – it is bulky, it is slow and its autofocus is very basic. All three are issues, especially when shooting fast moving kids! With the newly announced Canon 5D mark III, it looks like Canon have solved two of these three issues – the autofocus system in the new Camera looks to be first rate, it is also as fast as my 50D at six frames per second, so it could easily replace two of my cameras with a new Canon 5D mark III. The mark III is still bulky however and expensive at $3500.

This is where I have an issue, not so much with the price itself, but with the fact that I lready have a 5D mark II, the cost to upgrade for a limited set of new features is high. Had the 5D mark III feature set been available in the mark II three years ago when I was upgrading from a 5D mark I, I would have preordered it on announcement days, even at $3500, but not now largely because of the announcement of the Olympus OM-D.

The Olympus is a fast camera (4.2 – 9 frames per second) it has an excellent autofocus system, its image quality is much better than the Panasonic GF1, though probably not quite as good as the 5D mark II, but better than the 50D probably, it accepts the same lenses as the GF1, it can perform seven shot exposure brackets (for HDR images) it has good low light handling and it is small! So my thought is that the OM-D and the 5D mark II will complement each other. The Olympus answers all of my issues with the 5D mark II to an extent – image quality may be not quite as good, but excellent never the less. Between them, these two camera should fulfill my photographic needs.

My 5D mark II will continue to be my goto camera for landscapes and portrait shoots, but the Olympus will become my goto camera for candid shooting, HDR shooting and general carry around camera.

What about the Fuji X-Pro 1. Well this looks like it will be a great camera, but it wont deliver the image quality of the 5D mark II (neither will the Olympus), and is quite bulky at the same time. Also the autofocus system is questionable, thus not for me.

Will I buy the 5D mark III eventually, yes, probably later this year, but it isn’t anything I am in a rush for thanks to the Olympus.

 

 

Well the title is not strictly true for most people and myself when we talk about a 50mm lens. Often the first lens anyone buys is the one that comes with the DSLR. You can buy DSLR’s without a lens, but when its your first DSLR, hardly anyone will do that.

One of the most common tips I give to anyone who is going to or has just bought a DSLR is to buy a 50mm lens. Regardless of the camera manufacturer, they will most likely have a reasonably priced 50mm prime lens available. Prime you say, whats that? It basically means the lens does not have a zoom, the focal length is fixed, any zooming you want to do, you do using your feet, which can be problematic when shooting indoors or in a confined space, but as with most things, there are benefits and drawbacks, the lack of zoom some people consider a drawback, others consider it an advantage, but either way we’ll be discussing the many benefits of a 50mm prime lens below.

Cost

So you’re wondering how much a 50mm Prime lens will cost. At the time of writing a Canon 50mm f1.8 prime lens could be bought for $119 at BHPhotoVideo.com. For most people this is what I’d recommend. Of course Canon at least offers three 50mm prime lenses, the 50mm f1.8 ($119), 50mm f1.4 ($379) and the 50mm f1.2 ($1418). So whats the difference? The main differences are speed, f1.8 versus f1.4 versus f1.2, autofocus speed, low light handling, build quality; the f1.8 version is commonly referred to as the plastic fantastic for a couple of reasons… its plastic and its fantastic! There are other differences also such as color rendition, lens flare handing etc, but once you get to the point of wanting to know about those things, I suspect the job of this article will be fulfilled!

Canon 50mm Lenses

What do I use? I have both the f1.8 version and the f1.4 version and use the f1.4 version. This is the only Canon lens that I own which is not from their professional lens lineup (designated by the red ring as seen on the f1.2 version in the picture above). I thought about buying the f1.2 version, but never have because the focus speed of the f1.4 version is actually faster than the f1.2 version, and for taking shots of the kids, focus speed is important!

Advantages

So far I’ve told you the lens doesn’t zoom and its made of plastic, so you’re probably wondering why bother when you have a zoom lens that came with the camera?

6907130037 a6a16d4fce b ue

6907130037 a6a16d4fce b

Most kit lenses are inherently slow, typically f3.5 at their widest focal length to f5.6 or f6.3 at their longest focal length. This is the disadvantage of that kit lens, they are cheap and zoom, so in the world of swings and roundabouts, you have to give up speed. Typically of the three – zoom, speed and price, you can get two, i.e. speed and zoom equates to high price, speed and lower price equates to no zoom, zoom and low price equates to slow lens.

So lets take a look at one of the shots I took yesterday. Using photoshop, I try to show what the photo may have looked like shot with a slower zoom lens, i.e under exposed, in reality it would probably have also been blurred and the background would have been more in focus thus isolating the subject less, but this should give you an idea of the difference a fast cheap prime could make…

Direction of Lightsource

One other thing you’ll notice about the shot above, is that my son’s face is well lit. Typically a persons eye will be drawn to the brightest part of an image, so for shots of our children, we’d like that to be their face. So even with a fast lens I try to ensure that the subject is facing window light when indoors. Not only will this allow me a fast shutter speed at the correct exposure for their face, but it will also ensure there is more light hitting their eyes, if you want to see color and definition in the eyes, this is the key, you can see from the photo (the brighter one) above that my sons eyes are blue and nice and white, I haven’t messed around with brightening his eyes in photoshop or sharpened them separately, this is how they where shot in the camera. If he had been facing away from the window, I could have still gotten his face correctly exposed, but his eyes wouldn’t have been as nice and bright and alive as they are above.

In Summary

For cost to the speed of the lens, the 50mm cannot be beat and with a little practice, nice sharp photos can be attained in almost any indoor situation without a flash. So make the small investment, you won’t regret it, then we’ll move on to depth of field an isolating your subject.

Caveat

One thing to note is that I shoot with a ‘full frame’ camera, this means its sensor is the same size as a 35mm film frame. Most consumer seniors are smaller than this and thus a 50mm lens on a typical consumer DSLR will have a crop factor. This means the effective length of a 50mm prime lens on a Canon will be approx 80mm, for a Nikon approx 75mm. The net effect of this, its that the lens will seem like it has a longer focal length than on my camera, and thus you’d have to take a few steps back to frame the shot above in the same way as I did. On the plus side, if you’ve seen photos of people taken with a wide angle lens, you’ll know they have big noses in those photos and if you’ve seen photos of people with a telephoto lens (long focal length), you’ll know that people look skinnier than they really are, well 80mm is about the correct focal length to have no such distortions, whether than it something you want or not is another question!

 

This tip is kinda late as winter is almost over (what winter you may ask).

During the winter months I find a lot of my shots of the kids is indoor; often its just too cold and miserable outside for everyone. Shooting indoors presents its own challenges, the main on is getting sharp shots.

When shooting family portraits, families will often ask for advice which I am happy to provide where I can, the most common issue is “my photos are always blurry!”. This is often due to the camera they have which is more often than not an ultra compact point and shoot style camera, these types of camera are inherently slow and difficult to shoot kids with. Though these days more and more people have a DSLR of some variety or another which are more than capable of shooting great photos of the kids, and yet the problem of blurry photos persists.

There are a variety of reasons for this, but one of the main reasons is the shutter speed that people are taking photos with is often two low. The standard rule is that your shutter speed should be 1.6 times (1.6 crop factor is applicable to most consumer DSLR’s) the focal length of your camera. Sounds complicated, but it really isn’t, here is an example. If you have a cheap and excellent 50mm f1.8 prime lens on your typical Canon Rebel (insert similar Nikon model here!), your shutter speed should be 50×1.6, which is approximately 1/80 of a second, minimum to get sharp shots avoiding camera shake when shooting a still subject.

Here is the secret though, kids are never still, so if you follow this advice, you’ll find that you get less than sharp photos more often than not, so my secret source is to ensure your shutter speed is 2-3 times your focal length, so in the example above for a 50mm lens, I would advise 1/150 or faster.

Give it a shot (pardon the pun) and let me know if it helps!

Photos below all shot with a Canon 5DmarkII (crop factor of 1, so following my rule, shutter speed should be 1/100 minimum) and a 50mm f1.4 lens…

 

ISO400, f1.4, 1/100s, focus on the eyes…

The making of a King

 

And a bonus tip for those who read to the end, you may need to bump up your ISO settings to get the shutter speed you need.

Bonus tip two… notice that in each shot, the subject is facing the window light, more on this coming up…

Feb 202012
 

Just when I thought I was done with flickr for purposes other than being a cheap online backup system… it bites me in the ass! Last night I got an email notification from flickr that some guy had started following my flickr stream, this is nothing new, but the flickr name peaked my interest (outofchicago.com) so I took a look at his flickr stream. What I saw impressed me, his shooting style reminded me of the now defunked windy pixel blog ran by Justin Kern before he relocated to California.

The guy is (Chris as I now know) holding a photo walk around the University of Chicago on March 10th. Figured I’d drop him a note to see if I could tag along as its a place I haven’t shot before and I have a bit of a personal 2012 resolution to broaden my photographic horizons more, try more HDR, more industrial and street photography, I may like it I may not, but I am a firm believer that the best photographers are those capable and willing to turn their lens to any genre of photography, so that is where I aim. Looking at Chris’s stream I could see some outstanding HDR work at the university. I happened to mention that I was gonna go out shooting myself today, and he invited me to join him and a few friends to shoot sunrise and the Adler Planetarium. Why not I figured, I’ve shot there before, but given the time of year and the fact that a lot of office lights would be on, I thought I might get a good cityscape pano, something I have never gotten around to shooting before, so at 4:45am, I headed into the city.

And thats the thing with flickr, as much as it sucks (and it does suck, and is getting worse), it is the only photography sight where I have actually met and shot with fellow photographers from.

Did I get my pano, I think so…

After a could of attempts I took the above photo which is a composite made up of 12 photographs resulting in quite a sizable image.

But above that, I got to meet some great photographers who I hope to shoot with again sometime, thanks to flickr.

 

I was supposed to have an Engagement shoot yesterday, but due to circumstance that had to be rescheduled to early July, which gave me a spare afternoon and a new Cheetah QBox Softbox that I wanted to try out. So I decided to get some shots of the boys, everything seemed to align, Cole had cut his hair with scissors a couple of days before, so was sporting a new enforced haircut as was Ben, I had found a new location to shoot and as mentioned I was wanting to try the Cheetah QBox Softbox out for the first time.

So saturday morning myself and Cole headed for the shopping mall intent on buying some new outfits for them; Cole likes clothes shopping when the promise of a round of glow golf is on the end of it!

So with clothes shopping mission complete and armed with an arsenal of candy for bribary purposes, out we headed out on Saturday afternoon to my newly discovered location, below are some samples of what we got, all lit with just natural light and the QBox used to lift the shadows on the boys and lift the boys out of the background a little.

Also worth reminding everyone, that when its not raining, the weather is now great for family and children photos now, so don’t forget to book, as there is always gonna be someone that waits and then misses out before the weather gets too cold, it happens every year :-) .

 


Recently my trusty double fold Westcott shoot though umbrella went the way of most conventional umbrellas – the fabric ripped from the structure of the umbrella. It served me well. Instead of replacing like for like I decided to look for a portable softbox to allow better control of the light.

When it comes to portable softboxes there are three main players I learnt, the following is a few pros and cons of each from my point of view, hopefully helpful to someone else also.

The main three are the Westcott Apollo softbox, available in various sizes; though I was looking at portability, so was interested in the 28″ version. Following the Westcott is the Lastolite Ezybox available in various sizes, but again, in the name of portability I was interested in the 24″ version. Lastly and I say lastly because I didn’t discover this one until I had almost decided on the Ezybox, the Cheetah Qbox which also comes in various sizes, but I was interested in the 24″ version.

Lastolite Ezybox

Westcott Apollo

Cheetah Qbox

Both the Ezybox and QBox are very similar in design, they both fold up popup style, both have a flash mount behind the softbox, thus making it easily accessible for adjustment, and both are 24″ square in size. The Apollo is a bit different in that the flash is mounted internally to the softbox and the softbox folds up using the same mechanism as an umbrella. Of the 3 the Apollo is probably the most popular and has a great reputation for producing excellent quality light.

I discounted the Apollo though fairly quickly as I didn’t like the fact that I had to open the softbox to make adjustments to my flash, this would be less of an issue if I used ETTL capable radio triggers but as it is I use Pocket wizard PlusII’s which are fully manual.

The Ezybox solves this issue by mounting the flash on the back of the softbox, thus making it easily accessible, problem solved, however the decision is not so simple if price is considered, the Apollo being approx $120 and the Ezybox being approx $220. One other issue I had heard though with the Apollo is that adjusting the angle of the softbox is tricky due to its design, again less of an issue with the Ezybox.

I then came across the QBox which is produced by a smaller company than Lastolite, but for all intense and purpose it looked to be identical to the Ezybox, save a couple of key differences… it folds up smaller, it is slightly deeper, it comes with a grid included, it comes with a baffle to create round catchlight, it is $100 cheaper than the Ezybox at $120!

Qbox Grid

QBox Round Mask

After some more searching and reading in the internet I ordered the QBox. Though I haven’t received it yet, after experiencing Cheetahs customer service, I felt compelled to write something about that aspect at least.

The day after ordering the QBox, I received a phone call from Edward; the owner of Cheetah, he had noticed that on my order I had selected second day air shipping and called to see if I really needed second day shipping!
This was a first for me, normally when ordering items online, they just get shipped via which ever shipping method you selected at the time of ordering, not the case with Edward. He wanted to know when I needed the item by, on hearing that I needed the item for a shoot on Saturday, he quickly checked to see how long ground shipping would take to my shipping address. It looked like ground shipping would get the softbox to me by Thursday, in plent of time and for $14 cheaper than two day air shipping, so he updated the order and refunded me $14 making the QBox more than $100 cheaper than the Ezybox.

For now I wait for it to arrive and will report back on my findings once it arrives, but so far, I find it hard not to be anything but impressed with the Cheetah customer service, there are a few other companies could learn a thing or two about Cheetah!

 

I haven’t had much chance lately to get out and do some landscape photography, but on Friday evening the rest of the family where out at a birthday party so I took my travel kit to work with me and ventured around the southern end of Chicago to see what I could find. These shots were taken with my Panasonic GF1. Here are a couple of shots…

It took me a while to get this shot. I stood in the middle of the bridge waiting for a train to go by, it seemed like they were passing all to often until I arrived, then nothing. Eventually one came and went – I missed it due to me chatting with someone asking about my camera. I had a 105mm Lee polarizer attached to my 14-45mm Panasonic zoom lens via a lens adapter which allows me to use the same circular polarizer on all of my cameras, which is mighty handy, as they are quite expensive! It does look kinda odd I’ll admit, but it does the job.

Eventually a train did pass again and 1/40 of a second later I was on my way.

It took me a while to get this shot. I stood in the middle of the bridge waiting for a train to go by, it seemed like they were passing all to often until I arrived, then nothing. Eventually one came and went - I missed it due to me chatting with someone asking about my camera. I had a 105mm Lee polarizer attached to my 14-45mm Panasonic zoom lens via a lens adapter which allows me to use the same circular polarizer on all of my cameras, which is mighty handy, as they are quite expensive! It does look kinda odd I'll admit, but it does the job...Eventually a train did pass again and 1/40 of a second later I was on my way. (Jonathan Robson)

 

Wanted to get a shot of this before it dissappears. Who knows if it will disappear, but there are so few camera stores these days (I don’t consider Wolf to be a camera store). Ironically though I amd people like me are part of the reason for their disappearance also given I buy most of my equipment from B & H Photo & Adorama via the world wide innertube!

 

I could hear these guys for miles, assumed a large band, imagine my surprise when I realized it was just these five guys. Had a sticky situation though, I took a few shots then realized I had no cash on me for a tip, so had to leave, head to the bank, when I returned they had gone, luckily I spotted them across the street heading home and managed to catch up with them to give them some money.

© 2012 Jonathan Robson Photography Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha