
This is a question I get asked alot, and its one that I cannot really answer as it is dependant on so many variables and what is important to the person asking the question – do you value image quality, size, autofocus speed, frames per second… the list is almost endless, the question is somewhat similar to someone asking “What car should I buy?”.
But a question I can answer is what camera would ‘I’ buy. Recently there has been rash of new cameras being released. Nothing new there, there are new cameras being released all the time, however recently there have been four notable camera releases, camera releases that people; photographers in particular, have been waiting for. The notable cameras I am talking about are:
- Fuji X-Pro1 (16mp) ($1700)
- Olympus OM-D E-5M (16mp) ($999)
- Canon 5D mark III (22mp) ($3500)
- Nikon D800 (36mp) ($2999)
The Nikon is not that interesting to me. It is a great camera, but I have a large investment in Canon lenses, so shifting to a Nikon system would be a huge undertaking for me, as a result I wont focus on that camera in this post. The other 3 are of interest to me though for a couple of reasons.
My current camera lineup includes three cameras, a small one, a large one and a fast one, as follows -
Panasonic GF1
This is my small camera. It has pretty good quality in good light conditions, takes interchangable micro fourthirds lenses, is relatively fast for a small camera, the sensor is quite large for such a small camera, much larger than your average pocket size point and shoot.
Canon 50D
This is my fast camera, it will shoot at six frames per second which is more than enough for my needs, it takes all of my Canon lenses, it has an identical user interface to my Canon 5D mark II; so I can setup both cameras to work identically, its image quality is excellent in good to average light conditions. It also has a crop sensor which means I get a bit more reach out of my lenses (see previous post on crop sensors).
Canon 5D markII
This is my high quality camera. The image quality it delivers is among the best in the 35mm sized camera category. It delivers large 21megapixel images, fantastic colors and is excellent in all light conditions (at least that I shoot in). But it is slow as compared to the 50D at three frames per second, has an archaic autofocus system and can only shoot exposure brackets of three shots, but this camera is all about image quality and it is my goto camera for portrait shoots and landscape shoots and even candid shooting, because I like good image quality. It spends a good majority of its time attached to a tripod.
New Crop of Cameras
So am I buying a new camera, the short answer is, yes! I preordered the Olympus OM-D E-M5 the day it was announced as a replacement for my Panasonic GF1, it should be here in about a month from now. I wont however be upgrading my Canon 5D mark II to the just announced Canon 5D mark III, here is why…
When I want high quality photos of anything, I always use my Canon 5D mark II, it is my goto camera most of the time, however it has a couple of drawbacks – it is bulky, it is slow and its autofocus is very basic. All three are issues, especially when shooting fast moving kids! With the newly announced Canon 5D mark III, it looks like Canon have solved two of these three issues – the autofocus system in the new Camera looks to be first rate, it is also as fast as my 50D at six frames per second, so it could easily replace two of my cameras with a new Canon 5D mark III. The mark III is still bulky however and expensive at $3500.
This is where I have an issue, not so much with the price itself, but with the fact that I lready have a 5D mark II, the cost to upgrade for a limited set of new features is high. Had the 5D mark III feature set been available in the mark II three years ago when I was upgrading from a 5D mark I, I would have preordered it on announcement days, even at $3500, but not now largely because of the announcement of the Olympus OM-D.
The Olympus is a fast camera (4.2 – 9 frames per second) it has an excellent autofocus system, its image quality is much better than the Panasonic GF1, though probably not quite as good as the 5D mark II, but better than the 50D probably, it accepts the same lenses as the GF1, it can perform seven shot exposure brackets (for HDR images) it has good low light handling and it is small! So my thought is that the OM-D and the 5D mark II will complement each other. The Olympus answers all of my issues with the 5D mark II to an extent – image quality may be not quite as good, but excellent never the less. Between them, these two camera should fulfill my photographic needs.
My 5D mark II will continue to be my goto camera for landscapes and portrait shoots, but the Olympus will become my goto camera for candid shooting, HDR shooting and general carry around camera.
What about the Fuji X-Pro 1. Well this looks like it will be a great camera, but it wont deliver the image quality of the 5D mark II (neither will the Olympus), and is quite bulky at the same time. Also the autofocus system is questionable, thus not for me.
Will I buy the 5D mark III eventually, yes, probably later this year, but it isn’t anything I am in a rush for thanks to the Olympus.